 
      Improving work incentives in Serbia: Evaluation of a tax policy reform using SRMOD
    
      
        Cite  this article
        as: S. Ranđelović, J. Žarković Rakić; 2013; Improving work incentives in Serbia: Evaluation of a tax policy reform using SRMOD; International Journal of Microsimulation; 6(1); 157-176.
      doi: 10.34196/ijm.00080
      
  
- Article
- Figures and data
- Jump to
Figures
            Figure 1
          
    
    
            
    
       
              Progressivity of the labour taxation system.
Note: Scatter plot of tax wedge for a single at 33% of average wage (percent) versus progressivity of tax wedge (percentage point change) for selected European countries (2008).
Source: World Bank (2010, p. 12).
Tables
            Table 1
          
    
    
            Inactivity and unemployment rates by education and gender (%).
| Level of education | Inactivity rate | Unemployment rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| Primary | 32.4 | 64.4 | 21.5 | 25.1 | 
| Secondary | 24.5 | 40.9 | 22.4 | 26.5 | 
| Tertiary | 18.0 | 22.4 | 15.5 | 14.2 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: Labour Force Survey, 2011, age: 25–64. 
            Table 2
          
    
    
            Proportion of unemployed and inactive without work experience by education and gender (%).
| Level of education | Unemployed | Inactive | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| Primary | 35.1 | 42.3 | 14.9 | 55.0 | 
| Secondary | 18.8 | 26.0 | 12.3 | 22.0 | 
| Tertiary | 30.0 | 38.2 | 6.3 | 14.7 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: Labour Force Survey, 2011, age: 25–64. 
            Table 3
          
    
    
            Comparison of tax wedge in Western Balkan countries and EU.
| Earnings as a % of the average wage | 50% | 67% | 100% | 167% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | year | ||||
| Serbia | 2006 | 42.3% | 42.3% | 42.3% | 42.3% | 
| 2007 | 37.6% | 38.4% | 39.2% | 39.7% | |
| Albania | 2006 | 34.1% | 27.9% | 28.9% | 29.8% | 
| Montenegro | 2007 | 36.3% | 38.6% | 40.9% | 42.8% | 
| BiH Federation | 2006 | 30.6% | 29.3% | 32.3% | 35.3% | 
| R. of Srpska | 2007 | 31.7% | 31.6% | 32.5% | 33.2% | 
| Macedonia | 2007 | 41.2% | 37.8% | 38.6% | 39.2% | 
| EU-27 | 2008 | 37% | 40.6% | 45.1% | |
| EU-15 | 2008 | 38.1% | 42.4% | 47.6% | |
| NMS-12 | 2008 | 35.6% | 38.5% | 42% | |
- 
                        
                        Note: Tax wedge for a single person as a percent of total labour costs. 
- 
                        
                        Source: Data for Macedonia, Serbia, Albania, Montenegro and Bosnia (Leibfritz, 2008). Other data: from Eurostat 
            Table 4
          
    
    
            SRMOD macro-validation results: income tax and social contributions.
| Administrative records | SRMOD | Ratio (SRMOD/Administrative data) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average wage (in RSD) | 37,668 | 34,659 | 0.92 | 
| Personal income tax | 8,284,791 | 6,649,044 | 0.80 | 
| • salary/wage tax | 6,966,756 | 5,693,117 | 0.82 | 
| Social security contributions - on full time employment income and unemployment | |||
| benefits | 20,901,550 | 19,944,627 | 0.95 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: Own calculations using SRMOD. 
            Table 5
          
    
    
            SRMOD macro-validation results: benefits.
| SRMOD | Administrative records | Ratio (SRMOD/Administrative records) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recipients (HHs) | |||
| Monetary social assistance | 53,444 | 50,848 | 1.05 | 
| Child allowance | 229,221 | 199,323 | 1.15 | 
| Expenditures (in RSD) | |||
| Monetary social assistance | 274,347,719 | 253,897,376 | 1.08 | 
| Child allowance | 667,811,936 | 580,706,031 | 1.15 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: Own calculations using SRMOD. 
            Table 6
          
    
    
            Gini coefficient, before and after tax and benefit policy in Serbia.
| Baseline | Reform scenario | |
|---|---|---|
| Gini coefficient - original income | 44.75 | 44.75 | 
| Gini coefficient - disposable income | 38.63 | 38.59 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: own calculation using SMROD. 
            Table 7
          
    
    
            Number of gainers from the reform per deciles.
| % of individuals whose disposable income, after the reform, is increased by | ||
|---|---|---|
| Deciles | More than 2% | More than 5% | 
| 1 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 
| 2 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 
| 3 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 
| 4 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 
| 5 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 
| 6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 
| 7 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 
| 8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 
| 9 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 
| 10 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 
- 
                        
                        Source: own calculation using SMROD. 
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
     
       
            