 
      Taxation of closely held corporations – efficiency aspects
    
      
        Cite  this article
        as: P. Ericson, J. Fall; 2011; Taxation of closely held corporations – efficiency aspects; International Journal of Microsimulation; 4(2); 27-40.
      doi: 10.34196/ijm.00051
      
  
- Article
- Figures and data
- Jump to
Figures
Tables
            Table 1
          
    
    
            Average tax _ rates and size of alternative forms of organisations in SWEDEN 2005.
| Sole propriatorship | CHC | WHC privat | WHC public | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution of wages and dividens | Distribution of dividends | Distribution of wages and dividens | Distribution of dividends | |||||
| Number of firms | 735,917 | 190,981 | 96,638 | 339 | ||||
| AETR (%) | 55.4 | 31.8 | 24.3 | 27.3 | 27.6 | 32 | ||
| RAETR(%) | 60.1 | 34.5 | 26.3 | 29.6 | 30 | 34.7 | ||
| Turnover (MSEK) | 181,602 | 1,143,356 | 4,218,370 | 158,377 | ||||
| Wage bill (MSEK) | 8,381 | 180,418 | 448,064 | 16,663 | ||||
| Number of employees | 49,017 | 692,719 | 1,491,231 | 79,725 | ||||
- 
                        
                        Source: Sørensen (2008) 
            Table 2
          
    
    
            Number of observations.
| Year | Closely held corporations | Widely held corporations | 
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 167,069 | 42,526 | 
| 2002 | 171,550 | 38,718 | 
| 2003 | 173,980 | 37,329 | 
| 2004 | 179,884 | 35,976 | 
| 2005 | 185,568 | 35,061 | 
| 2006 | 189,178 | 37,395 | 
| 2007 | 190,097 | 40,748 | 
            Table 3
          
    
    
            Statistics on variables in a model aiming to explain the probability of becoming a CHC owner.
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| New CHC owner in 2006 (dependent variable) | 0.9% | 
| Sole propriator/partnership last year | 7.9% | 
| Avarage difference in disposable income (TSEK/YEAR) | 5.0 | 
| Woman | 50.2% | 
| Age < 30 | 9.3% | 
| Single | 22.4% | 
| Born in Sweden | 86.9% | 
| Living in a large city | 34.4% | 
| University degree | 19.8% | 
            Table 4
          
    
    
            Probit estimates of the probability to become a CHC owner.
| Parameter | Estimate | P-value | 
|---|---|---|
| Inte rcept | −2.5002 | <.0001 | 
| Sole propriator/partnership last year | 0.3729 | <.0001 | 
| Difference in disposable income | 0.00538 | <.0001 | 
| Woman | −0.2528 | <.0001 | 
| Age < 30 | −0.1446 | <.0001 | 
| Single | −0.1535 | <.0001 | 
| Born in Sweden | 0.179 | <.0001 | 
| Living in a large city | 0.1476 | <.0001 | 
| Unive rsity degree | −0.0512 | 0.0095 | 
| Discriminatory power | 0.35 | Somers’ D | 
            Table 5
          
    
    
            Disposable income elasticities to become a CHC owner.
| Hourly wage rate (decile) | Average hourly wage rate (SEK) | Elasticity | 
|---|---|---|
| All | 156 | 0.07 | 
| 1 | 95 | 0.01 | 
| 2 | 111 | 0.01 | 
| 3 | 120 | 0.01 | 
| 4 | 127 | 0.01 | 
| 5 | 135 | 0.02 | 
| 6 | 144 | 0.03 | 
| 7 | 156 | 0.06 | 
| 8 | 172 | 0.11 | 
| 9 | 200 | 0.17 | 
| 10 | 301 | 0.24 | 
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
     
       
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
              